Granville v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice:
Nathan Granville, the appellant, was convicted in Superior Court of selling heroin, in violation of 16 Del.C. § 4725. In this appeal, he raises three contentions: (1) the act which he committed is not punishable under § 4725 because he was acting as a procuring agent for the buyer; (2) the defense of entrapment bars his conviction ; and (3) there was error in the charge in the Court’s refusal to instruct the jury that they must be satisfied of his guilt to the utmost certainty.
On September 3, 1970, a police officer, dressed as a “hippie,” rode a motorcycle to 7th and Tatnall…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Commonwealth v. HarvardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. James William PrinceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. DinkelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Saienni v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
- State v. StoneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- Dobrosielski v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.