Legal Opinion · Dissent

Southern Maryland Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Blanchard

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 12, 1965No. [No. 227, September Term, 1964.]Published

1Dissent

HornEy, J.,

filed the following dissenting opinion, in which Oppenheimer and Barnes, JJ., concurred.

The majority, in ruling that the plaintiff was contributorily negligent as a matter of law on the theory that he was chargeable with knowledge of an existing dangerous condition irre*493spective of whether he had knowledge thereof, in effect hold that electric power companies cannot be held liable for injuries sustained by one who comes in contact with uninsulated wires that can be seen regardless of where such wires are erected or how negligently they are maintained. To me, charging the plaintiff…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Iowa Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Hamilton v. Laclede Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. State, Ex Rel. HendricksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
  4. Watson, Adm'x v. Virginia Elec., Etc., Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  5. Mayor of Cumberland v. LottigCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API