Legal Opinion
Bor. of Pitman v. Skokowski
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 1, 1984PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
193 N.J. Super. 215 (1984)
473 A.2d 100
BOROUGH OF PITMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
BARRY SKOKOWSKI, DIRECTOR OF THE DIVISION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT SERVICES, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 9, 1983.
Decided February 1, 1984.
Before Judges BOTTER, PRESSLER and O'BRIEN.
Warren H. Carr argued the cause for appellant (Cresse, Carr, Peaslee & Thompson, attorneys; Warren H. Carr on the brief).
Daniel P. Reynolds, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Irwin I. Kimmelman, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney, Deborah T. Poritz, Deputy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Gibbons v. GibbonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- City of Newark v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Moyant v. Borough of ParamusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- New Jersey State Policemen's Benevolent Ass'n, Local 29 v. Town of IrvingtonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Grant of Charter School ApplicationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Rock County v. SpireNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Ocean City v. SomervilleNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- TP. OF CEDAR GROVE v. SheridanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Essex County Corrections Officers Pba Local No. 382 v. County of EssexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.