Legal Opinion

Ex parte Lorraine

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1881No. 1,063PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Habeas corpus before tbe Supreme Court. Tbe facts sufficiently appear in tbe opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By tbe Court,

Hawley, J.:

In order to bold a fugitive from justice to await tbe requisition of tbe governor of another state, it must affirmatively appear from tbe complaint filed before tbe committing magistrate in tbis state: 1. Tliat a crime bas been committed in tbe other state. 2. That the accused bas been charged in that state witb tbe commission of such crime. 3. That be bas fled from justice and is within tbis state. *64(Criminal Pr. Act, secs. 651-653; 1 Comp. L., 2278-2286.)

The complaint upon wbieb petitioner was arrested accused him of having committed the crime of robbery in Alpine…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HuffordSupreme Court of Iowa · 1869
  2. Ex Parte WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burton v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Reichman v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Gallegos v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State Ex Rel. Kaiser v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API