Gallegos v. State
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court, Gibbons, J.:
Appellant Albert David Gallegos was convicted, pursuant to a jury verdict, of one count of unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of NRS 202.360(1)(b). Gallegos appeals, contending that NRS 202.360(1)(b) is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to define the term “fugitive from justice.”2 We conclude that NRS 202.360(1)(b) is unconstitutionally vague and reverse Gallegos’ conviction.
FACTS
In 2004, the State charged Gallegos with one count of unlawful possession of a firearm after police arrested him at his home in Clark County and found a firearm…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Drew v. ThawSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silvar v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RodgersMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Collins v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
- Pohlabel v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2012
- Hager v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2019
- Sisolak v. Polymer80, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.