Legal Opinion

United States v. Lakewood Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 10, 1934No. 6442PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The question presented on this appeal is J whether in the case of affiliated corporations ! returning their income on the basis of a con- ; solicited return, the parent corporation may deduct from net income its total loss on the sale of the stock of a subsidiary without reducing such loss by the amount of the op- , erating loss of the subsidiary already claimed and allowed.

The Lakewood Engineering Company, appellee, is the taxpayer. It filed a consolidated income and excess profits tax return for the year 1918, including in the consolidation itself, the Lakewood Galion…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Burnet v. Riggs Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1932
  4. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  5. UNITED PUBLISHERS'CORPORATION v. AndersonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marwais Steel Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. Ambac Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  3. Denton & Anderson Co. v. KavanaghDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958
  4. Ambac Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973
  5. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. George M. Jones Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API