Legal Opinion

McFarland v. Honeywell International Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 12, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00085Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON COLLEEN MCFARLAND, : : Plaintiff, : Case No. 3:20-cv-85 : v. : Judge Thomas M. Rose : HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., : : Defendant. : ______________________________________________________________________________ ENTRY AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, AND DENYING, IN PART, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOC. 11) ______________________________________________________________________________ Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Commercial Money Center, Inc. v. Illinois Union InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  5. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API