Legal Opinion

GEICO Casualty Co. v. Barber

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 15, 2014No. 5D14-427PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

GEICO Casualty Company seeks certio-rari review of the trial court’s “Order on Plaintiffs Motion to Amend Pleadings and Defendant’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment.” We grant the writ and quash the order.

In February 2009, Antonio Barber filed a complaint against GEICO for uninsured/underinsured motorist (“UM”) benefits following an automobile accident. He also filed a Civil Remedy Notice (“CRN”) as authorized by section 624.155, Florida Statutes (2008), alleging that he sustained serious and permanent injuries exceeding his UM policy limits. GEICO answered the complaint and responded to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Godwin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Wollard v. Lloyd's & Companies of Lloyd'sSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. Westgate Miami Beach, Ltd. v. Newport Operating Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  4. Harris v. Geico General InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2013
  5. Geico General Insurance Co. v. HarveyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adrian Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Company of IllinoisSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Adrian Fridman v. Safeco Insurance Company of IllinoisSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. EDITH GARRIDO v. SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  4. Travelers Home & Marine Insurance Co. v. CalhounDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API