People v. Cervantes
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, J.
In this case, we are called upon to *622determine whether a sentence imposed on an habitual offender, which exceeds the established sentencing guidelines limit, constitutes an abuse of discretion. Specifically, we must decide whether defendant’s sentences of ten to twenty years for breaking and entering with intent to commit larceny1 and four to eight years for felonious assault2 were improper. We conclude that the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in sentencing defendant because defendant’s past crimes had escalated in severity and were such that he had established his inability to be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. MilbournMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- People v. HendrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. PalmMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- People v. ShotwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Menendez v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. RiceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- People v. DixonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. ChandlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. TerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. EdgettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.