Munchak Corp. v. Caldwell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Judge.
At the trial on defendant’s counterclaim for specific performance, the trial court allowed defendant to introduce into evidence the entire record from the earlier hearing on plaintiffs’ claim for reformation. Plaintiffs contend the court’s action was in error.
It is clear that in most circumstances, testimony from a former trial is hearsay and inadmissible in a subsequent trial. “[Previously recorded testimony is authorized if it be shown that: (1) The witness is unavailable; (2) the proceedings at which the testimony was given was a former trial of the same cause, or a preliminary…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- In Re BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State Highway Commission v. HemphillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Harborgate Property Owners Ass'n v. Mountain Lake Shores Development Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- North Carolina Medical Society v. North Carolina Board of NursingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Jensen v. Southwestern States Management Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
- E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Bayer Cropscience L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.