Segali v. Idaho Youth Ranch, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
RYAN, Chief Judge.
I. FACTS & PROCEDURE
The above-entitled action arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), as amended (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). Plaintiffs, Douglas and Anna Segali, former employees of the Idaho Youth Ranch, commenced this action on October *130320, 1987, principally for the purpose of recovering unpaid overtime compensation under the FLSA.
Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Mr. and Mrs. Segali brought this action on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Idaho Youth Ranch employees.1 Plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Friedlander v. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & AshmoreDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
- Marshall v. Rosemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joles v. Johnson County Youth Service Bureau, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995