Legal Opinion

Segali v. Idaho Youth Ranch, Inc.

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided May 18, 1990No. Civ. No. 87-1310PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

RYAN, Chief Judge.

I. FACTS & PROCEDURE

The above-entitled action arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), as amended (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). Plaintiffs, Douglas and Anna Segali, former employees of the Idaho Youth Ranch, commenced this action on October *130320, 1987, principally for the purpose of recovering unpaid overtime compensation under the FLSA.

Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), Mr. and Mrs. Segali brought this action on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated Idaho Youth Ranch employees.1 Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Tony and Susan Alamo Foundation v. Secretary of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Friedlander v. Troutman, Sanders, Lockerman & AshmoreDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1984
  5. Marshall v. Rosemont, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joles v. Johnson County Youth Service Bureau, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API