Legal Opinion

Schip v. Pabst Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 29, 1896No. Nos. 9647-(250)PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Otis, J., denying a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

Defendant was the owner of an old stone building, which had been built on the steep side of a bluff at the corner of Wabasha and Third streets in St. Paul. The rear of the building, facing the Mississippi river, was five stories high, while the front was only two stories above the grade of said streets. The building was in a decayed and dangerous condition to such an extent that it became necessary to have it torn down. The defendant advertised for bids for taking down the building, and one Gorton being the lowest bidder, a contract was let to him, whereby he agreed to take down and remove…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Deford v. State ex rel. KeyserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Wilkinson v. Detroit Steel & Spring WorksMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lawrence v. ShipmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1873

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Salmon v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Mallory v. Louisiana Pure Ice & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Ray v. SchneiderConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  4. Sutherland v. BartonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  5. White v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API