Ramey v. Harber
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
TURK, Chief Judge.
This action is predicated on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 et seq. and came to be tried by this court. Perceiving this case to involve certain factual issues of great import, the court empaneled an advisory jury to assist the court in the consideration of such questions, pursuant to Rule 39(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Following trial of this case, conducted from January 26, 1977 through January 28,1977, the advisory jury responded to special verdict form questions with answers totally favorable to plaintiffs. By way…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bettye Keener Stegmaier, Etc. v. Jerry Pete Trammell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Commonwealth v. KeyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- King v. McMillanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
- Ramey v. HarberCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Aucoin v. HaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.