Legal Opinion
People v. Muhammed C.
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 7, 2002No. H022642PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PREMO, Acting P. J.
juvenile court found appellant Muhammed C. to be a person described by Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 in that he resisted, delayed, or obstructed an officer (Pen. Code, § 148, subd. (a)) 1 and committed an assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (§ 245, subd. (a)(1)). On appeal, appellant contends that no substantial evidence supports the finding as to section 148, subdivision (a). We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Scope of Review
Our review is governed by the same principles applicable to adult criminal appeals. (In re Roderick P.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Duran v. City Of DouglasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Kirkpatrick v. Roderick P.California Supreme Court · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Smith v. City of HemetCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Yount v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Johnson v. Bay Area Rapid Transit DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Gabbi Lemos v. County of SonomaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- People v. SeijasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.