Legal Opinion
Galvin v. Gillette Co.
Massachusetts Superior Court
Decided May 19, 2005No. 051453BLSPublished
1Opinion of the Court
van Gestel, Allan, J.
These matters came before the Court at its direction for a Rule 16 conference regarding scheduling what, if anything, remains to be litigated after the entry of the Memorandum and Order of April 28, 2005 (the “Memorandum”) (19 Mass. L. Rptr. 291).1 The parties differ widely on what remains. The Secretary of the Commonwealth (the “Secretary”) seeks further wide-ranging orders regarding compliance with a Second Subpoena and other matters occurring after the April 28, 2005 Memorandum. The Gillette Company (“Gillette”) contends that nothing remains to be litigated and that it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Nycal Corp. v. KPMG Peat Marwick LLPMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Golber v. BayBank Valley Trust Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
- United States v. Nancy Gertner, Etc., John Doe, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Stolzoff v. Waste Systems International, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.