Golber v. BayBank Valley Trust Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
Although there are essentially two parties in this appeal, there were three participants in the underlying commercial triangle. The now silent party was D & W Architectural Woodworking Corporation (D & W), a troubled, but allegedly venerable, enterprise which produced architectural woodworking, store and bank fixtures and shelving, and automated teller *257machine and other interactive environments. By November, 1992, the defendant, BayBank Valley Trust Company (BayBank or bank), had provided financial support to D & W in the form of notes and a line of credit totaling nearly $500,000. But D & W…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nota Construction Corp. v. Keyes Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Yorke Management v. CastroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Kannavos v. AnninoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Fox v. F & J Gattozzi Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Vassallo v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Marram v. Kobrick Offshore Fund, Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Brewster Wallcovering Co. v. Blue Mountain Wallcoverings, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Gossels v. Fleet National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
- NPS LLC v. Ambac Assurance Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Stagecoach Transportation, Inc. v. Shuttle, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.