Legal Opinion

Foti v. Town of East Hampton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 31, 2009PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CELR article 78 to review a determination of the Town of East Hampton, New York, Zoning Board of Appeals dated October 24, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied the petitioner’s application for a natural resources special permit and three area variances, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Whelan, J.), dated October 5, 2007, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

“[L]ocal zoning boards have broad discretion in considering applications for area variances and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pecoraro v. Board of AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. Gallo v. RosellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Millennium Custom Homes, Inc. v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Nozzleman 60, LLC v. Village of Cold Spring Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of 153 Mulford Assoc., LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of E. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  2. Matter of 260 BC, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of E. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025
  3. Matter of 278, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of the Town of E. HamptonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API