Dinkins v. Boncher
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________ ) JAMES DINKINS, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) Civil Action No. 21-cv-11847-AK v. ) ) WARDEN A. BONCHER, ) ) Respondent. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER A. KELLEY, D.J. Petitioner James Dinkins (“Dinkins”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The government responded to that petition by arguing that Dinkins has not identified any error in his sentence and has failed to identify any facts that warrant relief under § 2241 pursuant to the “savings clause” of 28 U.S.C. § 2255(e). [Dkt.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re Ocsulis DorsainvilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.