Legal Opinion

Insurance Co. v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 26, 1898PublishedCited by 1 opinion

• Assumpsit, on a contract of reinsurance. Trial in the Circuit Court of Du Page county; the Hon. Henry B. Willis, Judge, presiding. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Error by plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Dibell

delivered the opinion of the court.

First. It was proved that after the fire appellee tendered appellant $80 for the premium for said reinsurance and appellant refused to take the money. The offer was certainly evidence tending to show an admission by appellee that there was that sum due to appellant for the premium for said reinsurance. Under the stipulation no plea was necessary to enable appellant to set off that sum against appellee’s demand. The instruction, verdict and judgment each ignored this evidence of a set-off, and they are excessive in amount, as the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hartford Fire Insurance v. McKenzieAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manchester Fire Assurance Co. v. Insurance of IllinoisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API