Meiners v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

DANA, Justice.

Janice Meiners appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Waldo County, Kravchuk, J.) and from the denials of her motion to amend the judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 59(e) and her motion for relief from the judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(6). Because the Superior Court did not misinterpret our mandate in Meiners v. Aetna Casualty & Sur. Co., 645 A.2d 9 (Me.1994) (hereinafter Meiners I) and did not abuse its discretion in denying the post-judgment motions, we affirm the judgment.

The facts in this ease are set forth in Meiners I in which we held that Aetna’s…