State v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Appeal from a judgment.- Defendant was convicted of the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. On cross-examination he was required to testify over proper objection that he had first plead guilty to the accusation made in the information upon which he was on trial and that he thereafter withdrew such plea by leave of the court. This was error. Under such circumstances the former plea is held for naught. Kercheval v. U. S. 274 U. S. 220, 47 S. Ct. 582, 71 L. ed. 1009. A new trial is granted.
Reversed.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. SpitaleriNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. StreetMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- State v. ReardonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. ThomsonOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- People v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.