Legal Opinion

Nathan Andrew Kniatt v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided December 5, 2007No. 10-03-00199-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-03-00199-CR

Nathan Andrew Kniatt,

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas,

Appellee

From the 40th District Court

Ellis County, Texas

Trial Court No. 25704CR

abatement order on motion for rehearing

The principal issue before us in Appellant Nathan Kniatt’s motion for rehearing is whether the trial judge who heard Kniatt’s motion to recuse District Judge Gene Knize correctly applied or interpreted the law governing recusal. We will abate this appeal for a new hearing on Kniatt’s recusal motion.

Procedural Background

Kniatt was charged by indictment for possession of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API