Legal Opinion
Boxill v. Boxill
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 26, 1952PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
Plaintiff and defendant are sister and brother. From July to October of 1943, they discussed the *388matter of a joint business enterprise, and finally orally agreed to become partners, and as such to lease from the owner certain premises known as Number 129 West 119th Street, in New York City. The property was to be used as a home for both parties and was to be operated as a rooming house, and the profits and losses were to be divided equally. Pursuant to this agreement and on October 12,1943, plaintiff and defendant as tenants signed a three-year lease for the premises, and soon thereafter…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Hitchman Coal & Coke Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Wendt v. FischerNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- King v. . BarnesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Mitchell v. . ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Pace v. PerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Newburger, Loeb & Co. v. GrossCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Chromalloy American Corp. v. Universal Housing Systems of America, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Backus Plywood Corporation v. Commercial Decal, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.