Legal Opinion · Dissent
Lindsley v. Phare
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided June 14, 1934Published
1DissentDavis, C. J.
(dissenting).—John J. Phare and wife, Elizabeth Gregory Phare, brought their bill in equity against Frances Lindsley, Alfred R. Baxter and Hattie E. M. Baxter, the object of the bill being to attack and have decreed void, the title that had been acquired by the said Frances Lindsley in and to a certain note and mortgage sold by a special master of the Circuit Court under a final decree that was subsequently reversed on appeal to this court in the case of Phare v. Randall, 97 Fla. 858, 122 Sou. Rep. 217. It was further prayed that the mortgage be foreclosed against the said Frances Lindsley,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- The BANK OF THE UNITED STATES v. the Bank of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Northwestern Fuel Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.