Housel v. Thrall
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Neville, J. Story Agency, § 201. Me Gants v. Wells, 4 S. C. (Eieh.), 381. Darling v. Stamvood, 14 Allen, 504. Commercial Banh v. Martin, 1 La. Ann., 344. Tiernan v. Commercial Banh, 7 How., 648. Daly v. Banh, 56 Mo., 94. Dorchester v. Banh, 1 Cush., 177. Story Agency, §§ 13, 14, 452, 454. Allen v. Merchants Banh of N. Y., 22 Wend., 215. Montgomery Co. Banh v. Albany City Banh, 3 Selden, 459. Com. Banhv.
Read the full summary
Error to the district court for Douglas county. Heard below before Neville, J. Story Agency, § 201. Me Gants v. Wells, 4 S. C. (Eieh.), 381. Darling v. Stamvood, 14 Allen, 504. Commercial Banh v. Martin, 1 La. Ann., 344. Tiernan v. Commercial Banh, 7 How., 648. Daly v. Banh, 56 Mo., 94. Dorchester v. Banh, 1 Cush., 177. Story Agency, §§ 13, 14, 452, 454. Allen v. Merchants Banh of N. Y., 22 Wend., 215. Montgomery Co. Banh v. Albany City Banh, 3 Selden, 459. Com. Banhv. The Union Bank of N. T., 1 Kernan, 203. Smedes v. Bank of Utica, 20 Johns., 372. Banh of Orleans v. Smith, 3 Hill (N. Y.),…
1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.
This action was instituted in the district court of Douglas county. The petition alleges substantially that plain*486tiff below, defendant in error here, employed defendant below, plaintiff in error in this court, who was a forwarding and commission merchant in Omaha, to forward to the city of San Francisco, in the state of California, and sell on commission at the highest market price for cash a certain quantity of lard of the value of $694.72, and that plaintiff in error received the lard and undertook to forward and sell it in the manner agreed upon, and in consideration of the commission…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Severance v. MelickNebraska Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Brown v. Estate of FunckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Shoyer v. Edmund Wright-Ginsberg Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Reed v. WoodNebraska Supreme Court · 1894