Shoyer v. Edmund Wright-Ginsberg Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hiscock, Ch. J.
This appeal involves the subject of factorage. The plaintiffs were manufacturers of a kind of piece goods known as chevalette. The defendant described itself as “ factors and commission merchants.” As the result of prior negotiations a written contract was entered into for the disposition of plaintiffs’ goods with the aid of defendant. This contract was in the form of a letter written by defendant and accepted by plaintiffs. It commenced with the introduction that it was “ a statement of the terms and conditions upon which we (the defendant) agree to act as factors for your…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Walls v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Newhall v. . AppletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Underwood v. . Greenwich Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lemnos Broad Silk Works, Inc. v. SpiegelbergNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- Irving Trust Co. v. B. Lindner & Bro., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Lucisano v. ParatoreCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949