Legal Opinion

Shoyer v. Edmund Wright-Ginsberg Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hiscock, Ch. J.

This appeal involves the subject of factorage. The plaintiffs were manufacturers of a kind of piece goods known as chevalette. The defendant described itself as “ factors and commission merchants.” As the result of prior negotiations a written contract was entered into for the disposition of plaintiffs’ goods with the aid of defendant. This contract was in the form of a letter written by defendant and accepted by plaintiffs. It commenced with the introduction that it was “ a statement of the terms and conditions upon which we (the defendant) agree to act as factors for your…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walls v. . BaileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Dana v. . FiedlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Newburger-Morris Co. v. . TalcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Newhall v. . AppletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Underwood v. . Greenwich Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lemnos Broad Silk Works, Inc. v. SpiegelbergNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Irving Trust Co. v. B. Lindner & Bro., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Lucisano v. ParatoreCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API