Legal Opinion

McKenzie Morrow v. Edward May

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided November 8, 2013No. 12-1329PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff sues under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, charging four Chicago police officers — May, Carroll, Town, and Pickett— with unlawful search (primarily a strip search), unlawful seizure (primarily a false arrest), and conspiracy, all in violation of the Fourth Amendment (made applicable to state action by interpretation of the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment), and adding a supplemental state law claim against the same defendants, plus the City of Chicago, charging malicious prosecution. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict exonerating all the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. VaroudakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Chake G. Kojayan, United States of America v. Hratch Meguerdity KalfayanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Jessie L. Redmond v. Phil Kingston, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Thomas D. OttersburgCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Hollins v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sara Lesende v. Arnold BorreroCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  2. Discount Inn, Inc. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. Discount Inn, Inc. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. Greene v. Crawford CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API