Legal Opinion

Feder, Nusbaum & Co. v. Solomon & Nathan

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1889PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. cited: Robison v. Uhl, 6 Neb. 328; Brunswick v. McClay, 7 Id. 137; Turner, Frazer & Go. v. Killian, 12 Id. 580; Severance v. Leavitt, 16 Id. 439; Cfurrie et al. v. Knight et al., 34 N. J. Eq. 485; Wallen jr. v. Rossman, Sheriff, 45 Mich. 333; Fearey v. Cummings, 41 Id. 376; FTedmanv.

Read the full summary

Error to the district court for Cass county. Tried below before Chapman, J. cited: Robison v. Uhl, 6 Neb. 328; Brunswick v. McClay, 7 Id. 137; Turner, Frazer & Go. v. Killian, 12 Id. 580; Severance v. Leavitt, 16 Id. 439; Cfurrie et al. v. Knight et al., 34 N. J. Eq. 485; Wallen jr. v. Rossman, Sheriff, 45 Mich. 333; Fearey v. Cummings, 41 Id. 376; FTedmanv. Anderson, 6 Neb. 392; Doyle v. Stevens, 4 Mich. 87; Bump on Fraud- • ulent Conveyances, 3d Ed., 136; Densmore v. Tomer, 14 Neb. 393; Doyle v. Stevens, 4 Mich. 87; Gaboon v. Marshall, 25 Cal. 201; Billingsley v. White, 59 Pa. St. 464;…

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

On the 10th day of May, 1888, the plaintiffs in error commenced an action in the district court of Cass county, to recover from the defendants in error the sum of $933-upon an account for merchandise sold and delivered, upon which account the sum of $425 was, at the commencement of the action, past due, and the sum of $508 was to become due on the 15th day of May, 1888. At the same time the plaintiffs in error filed in said action an affidavit *268for an attachment, alleging, as their grounds therefor, that defendants “have sold, conveyed, and otherwise disposed of their property, with the…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miele v. McGuireSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Rulofson v. BillingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Boyle v. G. & K. TRUCKING CO.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  4. Hewitt v. Commercial Banking Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wolf v. Marlton Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API