Legal Opinion

Gillum v. St. Louis, Arkansas & Texas Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 2, 1893No. 62PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAINEY, Associate Justice.

Appellants and C. M. and N. Houston were tenants in common, owning the Dikes league and labor of land in Hopkins County. C. M. and N. Houston sold growing timber thereon to Hargrove & Miller for crossties, piling, etc. They sold to Britton & Lyon, who used same on railway company’s roadbed. Appellants sue to recover for the timber thus used, alleging that the same was taken without authority.

The defendants’ answer alleged, among other things, that the timber was sold to the parties from whom they purchased, by the Houstons, who' were tenants in common with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Wheeler & MartinNew York Supreme Court · 1832
  2. McCord v. Oakland Quicksilver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Alford v. BradeenNevada Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kirby Lumber Co. v. Temple Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Buchanan v. JencksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1916
  3. Arrington v. McDanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Republic Production Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. De Witz v. Saner-Whiteman Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API