Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Howe

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 30, 2001No. 20000211PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Disciplinary counsel filed a petition for discipline against Bruce R. Howe. Howe contested the allegations of misconduct and was granted a hearing before a hearing panel. Howe did not tender a conditional admission under N.D.R. Lawyer Discipl. 4.2 until after the hearing panel issued its report and recommendation that Howe’s license to practice law be suspended for 30 days and disciplinary counsel had filed an objection. Disciplinary counsel has objected to the hearing panel’s recommendation that Howe’s license to practice law be suspended for 30 days. Asserting this Court has…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Disciplinary Board v. EllisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. McDonaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Disciplinary Action Against HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In RE DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST McCRAYNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. McCrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API