Legal Opinion

Rochelle v. Carr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 6, 1967No. 14610PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CADENA, Justice.

Plaintiffs, David B. Rochelle, Jr., and wife, Peggy, appeal from the granting of summary judgment in favor of defendant, Robert I. Carr, in a case in which plaintiffs sought to recover damages resulting from defendant’s trespass upon plaintiffs’ land.

Plaintiffs alleged that, on January 31, 1966, they entered into a written contract with Fritz W. Duelm whereby Duelm agreed to sell the land in question to plaintiffs, and that sometime thereafter, probably in March, 1966, but before the execution of the deed by Duelm conveying the land to plaintiffs, defendant instructed one of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cummer-Graham Co. v. MaddoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wardrop v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Clark v. GaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilen v. FalkensteinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Miloszar v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Don C. and Wynette M. Russell v. Robert B. Coward and Coward Land, LP, a Texas Limited Partnership, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2014
  4. John C. Wilen v. William Falkenstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006
  5. John C. Wilen v. William Falkenstein, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API