Legal Opinion
Burns v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINBERG, District Judge.
Defendant has moved for judgment on the pleadings under Rule 12(c), Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., 28 U.S.C.A., claiming that certain of plaintiff’s claims are either time barred or legally insufficient. The action is brought by a seaman’s administratrix who sets forth what at first glance appears to be two but is actually four causes of action. All rest upon the same alleged facts: while plaintiff’s intestate was a crewman aboard defendant’s vessel, the “Marine Trader,” he was served and ate poisonous barracuda meat •en July 25, 1955, which caused serious .injury, required…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Lauritzen v. LarsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- U.S. Lines, Inc. v. U.S. Lines Reorganization TrustDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Izquierdo v. Cities Service Oil Co. (Pa.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- McLaughlin v. Dredge GloucesterDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
- Savard v. Marine Contracting, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1969
- Miller v. Foster Wheeler Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.