Legal Opinion

Workman v. Freeman

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1956No. A-5394PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brewster

Petitioner Workman sued Hugh Freeman, Sheriff of Bailey County, Texas, respondent, and two of his deputies, for damages alleged to have been suffered from Workman’s arrest by the deputies, which arrest the deputies assert was lawful because done in their official capacity as deputies of respondent Hugh Freeman.

Numerous special exceptions were filed by Hugh Freeman to Workman’s second amended original petition, all urging that his pleading did not allege facts showing that the acts of the deputies were official acts for which the sheriff was liable. The trial court sustained these exceptions…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Maddox v. HudgeonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. Sheppard v. GillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. Sheppard v. GillTexas Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Workman v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Randy Rene Lozano v. William French Smith, Elton FaughtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Troy Lee Douthit v. Clarence Jones, Sheriff, Dallas County, Texas, and W. H. McCallumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Fonzie O. Martin v. Dallas County, Texas, Bill Long, A. Ramirez, and Don Byrd, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Rhoden v. BoothCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API