Legal Opinion

Sheppard v. Gill

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1936No. 6516PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Judge HARVEY

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

After due consideration of the opinion filed in this case by the Court of Civil Appeals (58 S. W. (2d) 168), said opinion is approved. The plaintiff in error contends that said court, in passing on the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s petition under the general demurrer interposed by defendants in error, Gill, and the surety on his official bond, should have taken into consideration fact averments contained in the separate answer filed by the codefendants of Gill and his surety. The contention is overruled.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sheppard v. GillCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  2. Workman v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. William Whirl v. C. v. (Buster) Kern and Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API