Legal Opinion

Layne-Arkansas Co. v. Seeman

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 9, 1927PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMcHaNey, J.

This is an action to recover special damages for the alleged breach of a contract for the sale and installation by appellant of a pump and motor to operate on the rice farm of appellee. The written contract is as follows:

“Layne-Arkansas Company

Irrigation Well Contractors Irrigation Supplies

State Agents Bessemer Crude Oil Engines

Stuttgart, Arkansas.

We guar antee Water or no Pay.

A duplicate in all cases to be retained by the customer.

“All orders accepted by us subject to delay in fulfillment on account of strikes, unavoidable accidents, or' other causes beyond our control. Any material proving…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Harrington v. BlohmSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  2. Johnson v. InmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Selig v. BottsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  4. Beeble v. Arkansas Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gibson v. Lee Wilson CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API