Legal Opinion

United States v. Sharp

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 2008No. 34092PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

We have accepted the following question of law certified by the United States District Court for the District of Utah, Northern Division: “Does an outstanding withheld judgment based on a guilty plea qualify as a conviction under Idaho law?” We answer the question in the affirmative.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On December 23, 1997, Douglas Sharp pled guilty to felony burglary in the State of Idaho. At the sentencing hearing on February 13,1998, the district court granted Sharp a withheld judgment and placed him on probation for three years. The conditions of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WageniusIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. O'DELLIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Ex Parte MedleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. State v. BarwickIdaho Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. LampienIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. FlowersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. Samuel Thomas GlennIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. Edward R. Hochrein, Jr.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. OrozcoIdaho Supreme Court · 2021

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API