Legal Opinion

State v. Flowers

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 2011No. 36036-2009PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

In this appeal, the defendant challenges his sentence for statutory rape and the denial of his post-sentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that he had not been advised of the requirement that he register as a sexual offender. We affirm the judgment and the order of the district court.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Twenty-four-year-old Halton Flowers (Defendant) was charged with three felonies: raping a sixteen-year-old girl in violation of Idaho Code § 18-6101(1); committing lewd conduct upon a fourteen-year-old girl in violation of Idaho Code §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. OgdenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. SunseriIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. State v. Robert Cassidy HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State v. ChavezIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
  5. State v. John LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API