State v. Flowers
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Chief Justice.
In this appeal, the defendant challenges his sentence for statutory rape and the denial of his post-sentencing motion to withdraw his guilty plea on the ground that he had not been advised of the requirement that he register as a sexual offender. We affirm the judgment and the order of the district court.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Twenty-four-year-old Halton Flowers (Defendant) was charged with three felonies: raping a sixteen-year-old girl in violation of Idaho Code § 18-6101(1); committing lewd conduct upon a fourteen-year-old girl in violation of Idaho Code §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. OliverIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. OgdenIdaho Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. SunseriIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Robert Cassidy HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. ChavezIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- State v. John LeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.