People v. Snider
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
At issue on appeal is whether the court’s response to several jury notes violated the principles of People v O'Rama (78 NY2d 270, 277-278 [1991]). We conclude that defendant failed to make a record that is sufficient to permit appellate review of this issue (see People v Kinchen, 60 NY2d 772, 773-774 [1983]), or to overcome the presumption of regularity that attaches to judicial proceedings (see People v Velasquez, 1 NY3d 44, 48 [2003]). The record does not establish that the court failed to fulfill its “core responsibility” under People v Kisoon (8 NY3d 129, 135 [2007]). There is no evidence…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. LoveNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. KinchenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. StarlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. KisoonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. LockleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. StocksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CornadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. DonosoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.