People v. Stocks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1050The defendant’s contention that the People failed to present legally sufficient evidence of physical injury to sustain his conviction of robbery in the second degree under count two of the indictment (see Penal Law § 160.10 [2] [a]) is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Hawkins, 11 NY3d 484, 492 [2008]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10, 19 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish physical injury (see Penal Law § 10.00 [9]; People v Chiddick, 8…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. GrayNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. HawkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- People v. O'RamaNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. GoughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. NealonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. GadsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.