Legal Opinion

State v. Gale

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 18, 1978No. 17-868, CA 10073PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Defendant was convicted of assault in the second degree in violation of ORS 163.175 and makes three assignments of error: (1) the court erred in submitting the case to the jury because there was no evidence that the can opener used by defendant in committing the assault constitutes a dangerous weapon; (2) the court erred in refusing to submit defendant’s summarized statement of the issues to the jury, as requested by defendant pursuant to ORS 17.230; and (3) the trial court erred in imposing a mandatory minimum sentence pursuant to ORS 144.110(1) upon a conviction for an offense which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. BusseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. WierCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  3. State v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  2. State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Smith v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Smith v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API