Rosenberg v. Rosenberg

The plaintiff instituted this action against his wife for the annulment of their marriage upon two causes of action in the complaint. The first cause of action alleges that the defendant was incapable of contracting marriage on account of insanity; the second, that the plaintiff was induced to marry the defendant by false and fraudulent representations that she was sane. Although the court made findings of fact to the effect “ that no competent evidence was submitted ” of the defendant’s insanity or of any fraudulent representations made by the defendant for the purpose of inducing the…