Legal Opinion

Paulus v. Crane Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 2014No. B246505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CROSKEY, J.

Plaintiffs’ decedent, William Paulus, died from mesothelioma caused by asbestos exposure. After trial, a jury found defendant and respondent Crane Co. 10 percent responsible for plaintiffs’ damages. Crane appeals, arguing (1) plaintiffs failed to introduce expert testimony that Crane’s asbestos alone (as opposed to acting in combination with others’ asbestos) constituted a substantial factor in the development of decedent’s mesothelioma and (2) the trial court erred in not reducing the damages awarded against it to account for settlements plaintiffs could obtain from other…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  2. O'NEIL v. Crane Co.California Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Lineaweaver v. Plant Insulation Co.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Stubblefield Construction Co. v. City of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Hernandez v. Amcord, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Patricia A. Murray Dental Corp. v. Dentsply Int'l, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Hernandezcueva v. E.F. Brady Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Hernandezcueva v. E.F. Brady Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. Patricia A. Murray Dental Corp. v. Dentsply Int'l., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API