Legal Opinion

Hernandezcueva v. E.F. Brady Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 22, 2015No. B251933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MANEELA, J.

— Joel and Jovana Hernandezcueva asserted claims for negligence and strict products liability, together with several related claims, against respondent E.F. Brady Company, Inc. (E.F. Brady), alleging that asbestos-containing products it distributed caused Joel Hernandezcueva’s mesothelioma. At trial, following presentation of the Hernandezcuevas’ casein-chief, the court granted E.F. Brady’s motion for nonsuit on their claim for strict products liability and some related claims. After the jury returned special verdicts against the Hernandezcuevas on their negligence claim,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Nally v. Grace Community ChurchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Katzberg v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Kriegler v. Eichler Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. Ambriz v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. Loomis v. Amazon.com LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Petitpas v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2017
  5. Reynolds v. EzriCare LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API