In Re Marriage of Crook
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kilbride
The petitioner, Robert L. Crook, appeals from the decision of the appellate court holding that: (1) the trial court erred in its division of retirement funds, and (2) the marital estate was not entitled to reimbursement of $40,000 for payment made on a joint loan for improvements to nonmarital property. 334 Ill. App. 3d 377. This court allowed Robert’s petition for leave to appeal. 177 Ill. 2d R. 315. We reverse in part and affirm in part.
I. BACKGROUND
The petitioner, Robert L. Crook, and the respondent, Patricia J. Crook, were married for 33 years. Robert was a farmer until 2000, when he…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Helvering v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. YazellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- In Re Marriage of SchneiderIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Johnson v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Depot v. DepotSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Webster v. WebsterNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.