Legal Opinion
WILDEARTH v. Public Service Co. of Colorado
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 9, 2010No. Civil Action 09-cv-1576-WDM-KLMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS
MILLER, Senior District Judge.
This case is before me on the Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 7) filed by Defendant Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy (“Xcel”). Plaintiff WildEarth Guardians (‘WildEarth”) opposes the motion. For the reasons that follow the motion is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
This is a case arising under the Clean Air Act section 112(g) (42 U.S.C. § 7412(g)). Xcel contends that this Court should dismiss WildEarth’s claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) as an impermissible…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- New Orleans Public Service, Inc. v. Council of City of New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harper v. Virginia Department of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- DCIPA, LLC v. Lucile Slater Packard Children's Hospital at StanfordDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
- WildEarth Guardians v. PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLO.District Court, D. Colorado · 2011
- Sobel v. St. Mary's Hospital & Medical Center, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2021