State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Tidewater Natural Gas Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodman, J.
While Carolina proposes to raise most of the money allegedly needed for the continuing and successful operation of its business from two classes, (a) its own customers to whom it distributes gas, and (b) municipalities and utilities who purchase for resale to their customers, this is nonetheless a general rate case and not a complaint proceeding provided for in G.S. 62-72. Utilities Comm. v. Light Co., 250 N.C. 421, 109 S.E. 2d 253.
The Commission’s findings, stated summarily in part and quoted in part, are: Carolina must pay for all the gas which it can demand and which Transco is obligated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Miller v. . GreenwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolinas Committee for Industrial Power Rates & Area Development, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- State Ex Rel. North Carolina Utilities Commission v. Piedmont Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Nantahala Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Time Warner Enm't advance/newhouse P'ship v. Town of LandisNorth Carolina Business Court · 2011
- STATE EX REL. UTILITIES COM'N v. EdmistenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Boren Clay Products Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. County of HarnettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.