Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Yost
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc. persuaded the district court that because several accidental discharges of small quantities of oil did not cause actual injury to the environment, the United States Coast Guard should not have penalized it although the spills violated applicable regulations. Today we find that the violated regulations are adequately supported by Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, commonly known as the Clean Water Act, in that Congress has now given to the President authority to prohibit environmentally hazardous substances if he…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Robert Blaine BoydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Thomas F. Puckett and Mildred M. Puckett v. Rufenacht, Bromagen & Hertz, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- National Grain & Feed Ass'n v. Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. John TumaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- In re Oil Spill by the Oil Rig "Deepwater Horizon"District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2012
- Chevron v. YostCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. John TumaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. John TumaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013