Legal Opinion

Rosemond v. Catoe

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 29, 2009No. 26679PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice KITTREDGE:

We granted a writ of certiorari to review the denial of Andre Rosemond’s application for capital post-conviction relief (PCR). Rosemond argues the PCR court erred in denying relief primarily due to a complete lack of mitigation evidence in the sentencing phase. We agree and affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for a new sentencing hearing.

I

Rosemond was convicted of murdering his live-in girlfriend, Christine Norton, and Norton’s ten-year-old daughter. Rosemond confessed to killing Norton and her daughter and cooperated with law enforcement. There is no dispute…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Rompilla v. BeardSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Smalls v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. State v. LangfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. State v. StarnesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API