Legal Opinion

Gordy v. Armstrong

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 13, 1940No. 13210PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Justice.

Since the orders complained of granted injunction '“as prayed” in the plaintiff’s amendment, except that the second order departed to some extent from prayer 2-b, the language of the amendment must be looked to for the purpose of ascertaining the terms of the injunction as finally granted, except as here indicated in reference to the second order. It was error to enjoin the defendant altogether from “shouting through megaphones on said parking lot from eleven o’clock at night throughout the remainder of said .night” (see prayer 2-a), and from “permitting or allowing on said…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Holman v. Athens Empire Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1919
  3. Warren Company v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Wilson v. Evans Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  5. Poole v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pullen v. MeadorsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API