Legal Opinion
Hoffman v. Titlow
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 13, 1907No. 6869PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Yakey, J., entered March 16, 1907, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover purchase money paid on a contract for the sale of real property.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
The parties to this action entered into the following agreement:
“Receipt for Earnest Money.
“Tacoma, Wash., May 16, 1906.
“Received from D. M. Hoffman the sum of five hundred dollars as earnest money and part payment for the following *81described premises, situate in the county of Pierce, state of Washington, to wit:
“Lot 10 in block 1203, New Tacoma, this day sold to D. M. Hoffman for the sum of $25,955, the balance of $25,-455 to be'paid as follows: $4,000 by conveyance to A. R. Titlow and H. H. Gove of lots 9 to 12 inc. Blk. 3514, New Tacoma, by warranty deed free and clear of encumbrances and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Miller v. Calvin Philips & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dooley v. StillsonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1925
- Wilson v. KorteWashington Supreme Court · 1916
- Robinson v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- Mast v. HooverWashington Supreme Court · 1923